With reimbursement pressures mounting and coding requirements growing increasingly complex, accurate code assignment is more critical than ever. The following real-world cases illustrate coding challenges involving thoracic and pelvic interventional radiology drainage procedures, including thoracentesis and CT-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Each case highlights procedural details that can affect code selection, such as imaging guidance, catheter placement, whether the catheter is removed or left in place, and the number of drainage catheters used. Below, our subject matter experts provide the appropriate code assignments and rationale, offering practical insight into how to apply coding guidelines to real-world scenarios and strengthen accuracy, compliance, and confidence.
SAMPLE CASES
CASE: THORACENTESIS
Written informed consent was obtained. Preliminary scanning was performed over the posterior left hemithorax. This demonstrated a moderate-sized left pleural effusion. After choosing an appropriate location, this area was sterilely prepped and draped. Local anesthesia was provided with buffered lidocaine solution. Then, using ultrasound guidance, a 5 French multi-side-hole catheter was advanced into the left pleural space. Pleural fluid was easily obtained. Approximately 60 cc were sent to the laboratory for further analysis. Subsequently, an additional 900 cc of pleural fluid were removed. A total of 960 cc was removed in total. The catheter was removed, and there were no immediate complications.
Impression: Ultrasound-guided left-sided thoracentesis as described.
CODE ASSIGNMENT AND RATIONALE
32555 Thoracentesis, needle or catheter, aspiration of the pleural space; with imaging guidance
Since the catheter was removed at the end of the session, code 32555 for thoracentesis would be assigned instead of 32557. Ultrasound guidance is included, so do not also code 76942.
CASE: CT-GUIDED PELVIC ABSCESS DRAINAGE
Indication: Diverticular abscesses.
Discussion: The patient was referred for abscess drainage with CT guidance; outside imaging had shown multiple fluid collections in the pelvis. The patient was reimaged at the time of the procedure with abundant oral contrast opacifying the colon. There are at least 2 apparently separate fluid collections and possibly a plaque of communication with a posterior portion of the fluid collection on the left. The fluid collections are amenable to anterior access, the posterior aspect of the fluid collection on the left is shielded by pelvic bone and internal iliac artery and neurovascular bundle. These findings were discussed with the patient’s primary doctor prior to the procedure, and it was determined that an attempt at percutaneous drainage would be made, and if this was either unsuccessful or incompletely resolves the fluid collections, then surgery may be considered. This was discussed with the patient and her daughter, and they agreed to proceed.
The patient was placed on the CT gantry in a supine position, the fluid collections were localized, and a skin entry site was chosen in each lower quadrant. The sites were marked, the areas were prepped and draped sterilely and local anesthesia was provided with 2% lidocaine. At each site a separate Accu-Stik needle was utilized to puncture the abscess cavities following provision of local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine. A wire was placed, the tract was dilated with a fascial dilator, and an 8-French locking pigtail multi-side-hole drainage catheter was placed over the wire into each of the cavities. A total of approximately 25 mL of purulent fluid was removed from each cavity, labeled separately, and sent to the laboratory for culture and sensitivity. Each catheter was placed to dependent drainage. The catheters were sutured to the skin surface with a single stitch each.
The patient tolerated the procedure well. Conscious sedation was utilized during the exam.
Impressions:
- Percutaneous CT-guided abscess drainage for two pelvic abscesses, two separate catheters placed. No immediate complication.
- Recommend interval follow-up with repeat CT scan in the next 2 to 5 days for re-evaluation of these fluid collections and to determine whether the posterior aspect of the left-side fluid collection is draining adequately.
- Conscious sedation utilized during the exam.
CODE ASSIGNMENTS AND RATIONALE
49406 x 2 Image-guided fluid collection drainage by catheter (e.g., abscess, hematoma, seroma, lymphocele, cyst); peritoneal or retroperitoneal, percutaneous
Two separate abscess collections were treated, each with a separate catheter placement. The report documents that the catheters were sutured to the skin, indicating that they were left in place. Guidance is included in 49406, so 77012 would not be separately coded. Modify or bill with units as directed by the individual payer.
⚠️ Your 2026 IR Coding Remains Under Threat, Creating Significant Risk to Your Bottom Line. These Are NOT All the Tips and Tricks Necessary for Success.
With every dollar of reimbursement counting more than ever in the face of payment decline and complex changes, it’s imperative to make sure your CPT® coding is correct and compliant. Master more coding topics and break down the complexity with our 2026 IR Masterclass: Abdominal Interventional Radiology Coding live on September 9, 2026, at 11:00 am CT (120 minutes). This webcast is an essential training tool for both audio and visual learners.
