CPAP Rule Can Trap Those Using Home Sleep Studies

Federal regulation is causing headaches for providers performing home sleep studies.

I often comment that I learn a new rule every week and that my clients constantly teach me new things. This story combines those two truths. 

A client taught me about a rule you need to know if your organization offers home sleep studies and any related organization dispenses continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices. The federal regulation 42 CFR 424.57(f) creates a “payment prohibition:”

“No Medicare payment will be made to the supplier of a CPAP device if that supplier, or its affiliate, is directly or indirectly the provider of the sleep test used to diagnose the beneficiary with obstructive sleep apnea. This prohibition does not apply if the sleep test is an attended facility-based polysomnogram.”

Before analyzing the provision, it is worth noting that it is very poorly drafted.  Note that the regulation uses both the term “supplier” and the term “provider” as descriptive nouns, using the words for an organization that “supplies” or “provides” tests or equipment. Such wording is perfectly acceptable in casual conversation, but in a highly regulated environment where there are defined terms, language matters. Both of those terms are very specifically defined within the Medicare program as proper nouns. A “supplier” is a person or thing offering services reimbursed under Medicare Part B, such as a physician, physical therapist, durable medical equipment (DME) entity, or independent diagnostic testing facility. A “provider” is a facility like a hospital, skilled nursing facility, or home health agency enrolled under Part A. 

Whoever wrote this regulation should know better than to say that a “supplier” is serving as a “provider” of the sleep test. Under Medicare, a supplier is not a provider, and a provider is not a supplier. Instead, the author should have used a verb so common in Medicare regulations:  “furnish.” The regulation should say “no payment will be made to a supplier who furnishes a CPAP if that supplier, or a related organization, furnished a home sleep study.

Now, back to the text. According to the regulation, when a supplier performs a sleep study that diagnoses a patient’s apnea, any CPAP device sold to the patient by any entity that is affiliated, either directly or indirectly, with the organization that did is not covered, unless the sleep study was an attended facility-based polysomnogram. Functionally, this means that when an organization provides a home sleep study, CPAPs provided by that organization or an affiliate are not covered by Medicare. The regulation defines “affiliate” as “a person or organization that is related to another person or organization through a compensation arrangement or ownership.” 

That definition seems quite broad. There is a compelling argument that all entities within a corporate organizational chart are affiliates. That could allow someone to argue that if one entity in a health system provides a home sleep study to a patient, no other entity in the system can deliver the CPAP to that Medicare patient. Organizations that are trying to lower healthcare costs by offering more economical home sleep studies need to understand that the use of a home sleep study may prevent that system from supplying the CPAP. If any affiliate in the same system provided the CPAP, there may well be an overpayment.

I can’t explain the policy that differentiates between home sleep studies and polysomnograms done in a facility, but Medicare has chosen to make the distinction. It isn’t realistic to know every Medicare rule. This particular one was not on my radar screen until a careful client pointed it out. 

Programming Note:
Listen to David Glaser’s live reports every Monday on Monitor Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

One Chart, Five Truths: How CDI Prevents the Same Diagnosis from Becoming Five Different Outcomes

What happens when everyone reviews the same chart, but reaches a different conclusion? In this case-based clinical documentation integrity (CDI) webcast, Penny Jefferson examines how documentation involving clinical support, timing, causation, linkage, and terminology can produce very different outcomes for ICD-10 coding, reimbursement, quality, risk adjustment, medical necessity, denials, and compliance. Using cases involving postoperative respiratory failure, severe malnutrition, and encephalopathy, you’ll learn the practical CLEAR framework to help attendees learn to evaluate whether a diagnosis is codeable, consistent, specific, reportable, and ultimately defensible across the different teams and systems that rely on the medical record.

September 30, 2026

Mastering Spinal Fusion Coding for Inpatient Facilities: ICD-10-PCS Precision, Documentation, and MS-DRG Impact

Spinal fusion cases are among the most complex inpatient procedures to code, where even minor ICD-10-PCS errors can affect MS-DRG assignment, reimbursement, compliance, and audit outcomes. This practical webcast provides a step-by-step framework for interpreting operative reports, assigning accurate ICD-10-PCS codes, recognizing documentation gaps, and confidently coding complex fusion procedures. You’ll leave with practical tools that improve coding accuracy, reduce denials and audit risk, and strengthen documentation-driven reimbursement decisions.

July 29, 2026

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

Webcast Only Available On ICD10monitor Subscription – Subscribe Below

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Radiation Oncology Fundamentals: Coding, Billing & Compliance for Hospital Outpatient & Professional Services

Join Michael Calahan, PA, MBA for this radiation oncology coding and compliance webcast as he explains the fundamentals of coding, billing, reporting, and documentation for hospital outpatient and professional services. Learn how the 2026 radiation therapy coding changes affect current practices, how to distinguish technical and professional services, and how to address bundling, units, frequency, modifiers, and documentation requirements. Michael will also help you identify radiation oncology coding and billing vulnerabilities that could lead to denials, overpayments, repayment demands, or federal audit exposure.

October 20, 2026

CMS Compliance & Audit Readiness Bundle

Get two essential perspectives on CMS compliance for $199.

The Two-Midnight Rule helps you navigate short-stay admissions, patient status, and evolving 2026-2027 requirements, while CMS CRUSH explores the next wave of program integrity, payment oversight, and data-driven scrutiny.

Two RACmonitor webcasts. One practical approach to preparing for increased CMS oversight.

September 20, 2026

Preparing for 2027: Inpatient & Outpatient Policy Changes for Case Management and Utilization Review

The 2027 CMS policy changes will impact case management, utilization review, reimbursement, and patient status decision-making long before they officially take effect. Join nationally recognized physician advisor Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he explains the finalized and proposed inpatient and outpatient rule changes, expanding bundled payment initiatives, payment updates, and evolving payer expectations. Gain practical guidance to help your organization prepare early, strengthen compliance, reduce reimbursement risk, and confidently navigate the transition to 2027.

September 17, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24