Lessons Learned: What ICE Can and Can’t Do in an American Hospital

Lessons Learned: What ICE Can and Can’t Do in an American Hospital

There is a lot of talk lately about the need to follow orders given by a member of law enforcement. I would like to explore that a bit today and remind people of what Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) can and cannot do in a healthcare facility. 

Life in the Twin Cities has been a bit shocking for the last few weeks. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), under which ICE operates, has been ignoring several rights that I thought were universally accepted and constitutionally protected for almost 250 years. They’ve broken into homes without a judicial warrant.

Lawyers are being refused access to detainees. U.S. citizens have been arrested, flown to Texas, and after their citizenship was confirmed, told “sorry, get yourself back to Minnesota.” 

There are also actions which, while not necessarily illegal, are troubling, like ICE personnel being stationed at pharmacies. And since there are several examples of lawful immigrants who have been detained for long periods (I know of a chef with a green card who spent 10 days locked up), legal immigrants are terrified to leave their homes, let alone go to the pharmacy, the grocery store, or work.

So skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and other healthcare entities that employ immigrants are in a staffing crisis. But I am particularly worried by claims that filming government agents constitutes grounds to arrest or shoot someone. That should stop all of us in our tracks. 

I am certain that some folks are annoyed with me right now, thinking this is political, and not relevant to healthcare. I hear many people say “if you aren’t breaking the law, you have nothing to fear. Just do what the agents say.” That thinking scares me, and should petrify you, too. Because health fraud is a felony.

And if you bill for healthcare services, odds are you have screwed up, which means you could be accused of fraud. If you are reading this confident that you will never be accused of a crime, I urge you to reconsider. I assume that if you are audited, you want legal counsel. But if “failing to just do what the government says” is a crime, or a basis to get shot, finding defense counsel will be hard. 

I like to think I am gutsy, but mostly because I know the law is on my side. If I am required to just do whatever a government agent says, well, then I’m changing lines of work. And if it is obstruction of justice to challenge a government agent, logically, hiring defense counsel would be obstruction of justice as well.

If you think what the folks filming on the street are doing is different from what I do, I totally agree. They are FAR LESS intrusive to the government than what I do when I defend clients. It’s not close. I am actually trying to stop what they are doing, not merely record it. If they are breaking the law, I am smashing it. 

When the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) asks for money, do you have to give it to them, even if they are wrong? Of course not. Can they pepper-spray or beat you or shoot you for your exercising your rights? Not legally, no. I think it is an American duty to stand up for rights. “Just comply” is the very antithesis of American principles. 

Having articulated my fear about the state of defendants’ rights in this country, I want to move on to the rights and responsibilities you have if an agent visits a hospital or clinic. In one reported case, ICE personnel spent 24 hours in a patient room, the patient cuffed to the bed. Is that legal? Absent a signed judicial order, I would say absolutely not. 

What right does ICE or another government agency have to receive information about patients, or be present when medical care is delivered to people? First, consider what law applies. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is often mentioned, but in many states, HIPAA is essentially irrelevant, because it only creates a floor. HIPAA allows disclosures to law enforcement in many scenarios, but when state law is more protective of rights, it preempts HIPAA and controls. If someone is talking about HIPAA, verify that they have considered state law. In many states, law enforcement can get records only when there is mandatory reporting, like for abuse or gunshot or stab wounds.

If an ICE, Border Patrol, or other agent (while this article will refer to “ICE,” the principles apply to all government agents) claims legal authority, you need to ask them for a citation or document. ICE can have one of two types of warrants. A judicial warrant is signed by a federal judge and will have “United States District Court” at the top, and allows ICE to do whatever is on that warrant. Judicial warrants are very powerful, but also VERY rare. I would be shocked if you see one. Administrative warrants, which may say “I-205,” their immigration form number, are signed by someone within DHS, and allow ICE to grab a person in a public area – but that is basically it. They do not give ICE the right to go to a private area in a building, or to do much with the person, except arrest them when they are spotted in public. They certainly don’t give ICE a right to medical information. And they don’t allow ICE agents to enter any place that the public doesn’t enter. Assuming you expect people to check in before going to a clinic room or hospital floor, ICE needs a judicial warrant, from a U.S. district Court, to go there – and allowing them to wander around without a warrant likely breaches patient confidentiality.  

If ICE or another police agency brings you a person they believe may have violated the law, but who was injured during an arrest, my advice would be that the agents shouldn’t be involved in the care at all, but it is permissible to notify the agent when the patient is ready for discharge. You hide the individual at your own legal peril. By contrast, if ICE or other officers come by asking about a patient they did not bring to you directly, you should not give out information about the patient, including their readiness for discharge, absent a judicial warrant or court order. ICE is almost never allowed to have medical information about a patient. It is reasonable to expect the officer to step out of the room when the patient is examined. The time this gets grey is if the patient is coming from an ICE detention facility, and the agents are effectively the custodian of the client. 

If you see a dispute with any government agent who is demanding access to information or a location, I encourage you to record it on video it. It is ABSOLUTELY legal to record government officials in public places. The administration is trying to claim that filming is obstruction, but common sense and the federal courts know better. Filming doesn’t obstruct anything. I used to recommend getting an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) app, but that has been discontinued. I would then send a copy of the video to a few people, ideally including legal counsel, as quickly as possible. If there is patient data on the video, keep that in mind, and only send it to folks with whom you could share medical information. 

Recent events have the potential to make me think I am living in a post-legal world, but I also think America is resilient. On Monitor Mondays, I always end with a song. I rarely do so in articles, but for this article, I think a song is fitting. Despite my very deep anxiety about how dark things feel in Minnesota right now, I can’t help but think of Ray Charles’s opening words in America the Beautiful.

Oh, beautiful for heroes proved
In liberating strife
Who more than self, their country loved
And mercy more than life. 

Here’s hoping that mercy, and respect for law, will carry the day. 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Inpatient Ulcers and Gangrene: Avoid FY 2027 ICD-10-CM Coding, Sequencing, and Documentation Errors

Avoid costly inpatient coding errors involving ulcers and gangrene. This practical FY 2027 ICD-10-CM webcast clarifies pressure injury staging, non-pressure ulcer severity, diagnosis sequencing, documentation requirements, and POA reporting. Through real-world cases, gain the confidence to make defensible coding decisions, reduce denials, strengthen compliance, and support accurate reimbursement.

November 4, 2026

One Chart, Five Truths: How CDI Prevents the Same Diagnosis from Becoming Five Different Outcomes

What happens when everyone reviews the same chart, but reaches a different conclusion? In this case-based clinical documentation integrity (CDI) webcast, Penny Jefferson examines how documentation involving clinical support, timing, causation, linkage, and terminology can produce very different outcomes for ICD-10 coding, reimbursement, quality, risk adjustment, medical necessity, denials, and compliance. Using cases involving postoperative respiratory failure, severe malnutrition, and encephalopathy, you’ll learn the practical CLEAR framework to help attendees learn to evaluate whether a diagnosis is codeable, consistent, specific, reportable, and ultimately defensible across the different teams and systems that rely on the medical record.

September 30, 2026

Mastering Spinal Fusion Coding for Inpatient Facilities: ICD-10-PCS Precision, Documentation, and MS-DRG Impact

Spinal fusion cases are among the most complex inpatient procedures to code, where even minor ICD-10-PCS errors can affect MS-DRG assignment, reimbursement, compliance, and audit outcomes. This practical webcast provides a step-by-step framework for interpreting operative reports, assigning accurate ICD-10-PCS codes, recognizing documentation gaps, and confidently coding complex fusion procedures. You’ll leave with practical tools that improve coding accuracy, reduce denials and audit risk, and strengthen documentation-driven reimbursement decisions.

July 29, 2026

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

Webcast Only Available On ICD10monitor Subscription – Subscribe Below

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Radiation Oncology Fundamentals: Coding, Billing & Compliance for Hospital Outpatient & Professional Services

Join Michael Calahan, PA, MBA for this radiation oncology coding and compliance webcast as he explains the fundamentals of coding, billing, reporting, and documentation for hospital outpatient and professional services. Learn how the 2026 radiation therapy coding changes affect current practices, how to distinguish technical and professional services, and how to address bundling, units, frequency, modifiers, and documentation requirements. Michael will also help you identify radiation oncology coding and billing vulnerabilities that could lead to denials, overpayments, repayment demands, or federal audit exposure.

October 20, 2026

Preparing for 2027: Inpatient & Outpatient Policy Changes for Case Management and Utilization Review

The 2027 CMS policy changes will impact case management, utilization review, reimbursement, and patient status decision-making long before they officially take effect. Join nationally recognized physician advisor Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he explains the finalized and proposed inpatient and outpatient rule changes, expanding bundled payment initiatives, payment updates, and evolving payer expectations. Gain practical guidance to help your organization prepare early, strengthen compliance, reduce reimbursement risk, and confidently navigate the transition to 2027.

September 17, 2026

The Two-Midnight Rule: Strengthening Compliance Through the Fundamentals, 2026 Updates, & 2027 Proposed Changes.

The Two-Midnight Rule continues to be one of Medicare’s most closely monitored compliance areas and now the rules are changing again. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan for a practical review of the latest 2026 policy updates, the proposed 2027 OPPS changes affecting inpatient-only procedures, and the best practices hospitals need to reduce audit risk, strengthen admission decisions, and protect reimbursement. Leave with actionable strategies you can immediately apply to improve compliance and confidently prepare for increased federal and Medicare Advantage scrutiny.

August 11, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24