Long-Awaited CMS Fix to the NSA IDR Leaves Plenty to be Desired

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finally released its long-awaited No Surprises Act (NSA) Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Final Rule, introducing a series of changes that are meant to reshape how payers and providers navigate the NSA arbitration process – but does it actually address the underlying issues with the process? Not according to some.

Since the NSA IDR process began, dispute volumes and costs have far exceeded original projections, as you may have heard my colleagues and me say at least a few times.

The need for upgrades to the process have, at this point, become pretty obvious.

At the same time, the Trump Administration has really been aggressively promoting technology modernization across the federal government, whether that’s moving away from checks for all payments to and from the government or pushing payers and providers to electronic prior authorization. When viewed through that lens, the provisions of the Final Rule feel very consistent with the Administration’s broader approach.

That’s why one of the most important aspects of the Final Rule is the groundwork it lays for an enhanced federal platform to manage the IDR process, called the IDR Gateway.

The vision is to create a centralized online environment where all parties to a dispute can manage negotiations, initiate disputes, exchange notices, submit documentation, track deadlines, and communicate throughout the IDR process.

In many ways, it’s an effort to move the federal IDR program away from a patchwork of email and other manual processes and toward a more modern digital workflow.

The rule also expands the amount of information that health plans must provide with initial payments, to make it easier for providers to determine whether a claim qualifies for federal IDR and to reduce unnecessary administrative friction.

Certified IDR entities will now be required to determine whether a claim is eligible for the NSA IDR process within five business days after selection. New notice requirements, response timelines, and communication standards are intended to create greater consistency and accountability throughout the process.

Another headline change involves the basic cost to use the program. The administrative fee required to enter the federal IDR process will drop dramatically, to just $15 per party, per dispute. CMS hopes that lower fees, combined with more streamlined processes and improved technology, will make the system more accessible and efficient.

But while the rule does introduce meaningful operational and procedural changes, it’s important to take a look at what it does not do: CMS is focused on upgrading the infrastructure that supports the process, rather than fundamentally changing how the IDR process gets results. This leaves many of the issues providers and plans care about still in dispute.

The rule largely avoids addressing ongoing disputes surrounding the Qualifying Payment Amount, or QPA.

Providers have often stated that QPA calculations can significantly influence arbitration outcomes, and may not accurately reflect true market reimbursement rates. Plans believe that Congress specifically chose that as a key factor, and it’s an appropriate benchmark. Those conflicting viewpoints have been the subject of multiple lawsuits (we’re still awaiting a decision on TMA III), and they will likely remain a major point of contention between providers, payers, and regulators.

Similarly, the rule does little to address one of providers’ more practical issues of contention: collecting payment after winning an IDR determination. The Final Rule does not establish any new enforcement mechanisms or create a clear private right of action to collect unpaid IDR awards – another frequent-flyer argument in the courts.

So, this means that the litigation that has shaped much of the No Surprises Act’s implementation is likely to continue. CMS is improving how the process works, but not necessarily changing the underlying disputes that continue to drive conflict between providers and payers. So you’ll likely hear us continue to report on updates to the IDR process for many months to come!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Cate Brantley, JD

Cate Brantley is a Senior Government Affairs Liaison for Zelis. She has over 9 years of experience in both the public and private sector. Cate is licensed to practice law in the state of Oklahoma.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

One Chart, Five Truths: How CDI Prevents the Same Diagnosis from Becoming Five Different Outcomes

What happens when everyone reviews the same chart, but reaches a different conclusion? In this case-based clinical documentation integrity (CDI) webcast, Penny Jefferson examines how documentation involving clinical support, timing, causation, linkage, and terminology can produce very different outcomes for ICD-10 coding, reimbursement, quality, risk adjustment, medical necessity, denials, and compliance. Using cases involving postoperative respiratory failure, severe malnutrition, and encephalopathy, you’ll learn the practical CLEAR framework to help attendees learn to evaluate whether a diagnosis is codeable, consistent, specific, reportable, and ultimately defensible across the different teams and systems that rely on the medical record.

September 30, 2026

Mastering Spinal Fusion Coding for Inpatient Facilities: ICD-10-PCS Precision, Documentation, and MS-DRG Impact

Spinal fusion cases are among the most complex inpatient procedures to code, where even minor ICD-10-PCS errors can affect MS-DRG assignment, reimbursement, compliance, and audit outcomes. This practical webcast provides a step-by-step framework for interpreting operative reports, assigning accurate ICD-10-PCS codes, recognizing documentation gaps, and confidently coding complex fusion procedures. You’ll leave with practical tools that improve coding accuracy, reduce denials and audit risk, and strengthen documentation-driven reimbursement decisions.

July 29, 2026

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

Webcast Only Available On ICD10monitor Subscription – Subscribe Below

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Radiation Oncology Fundamentals: Coding, Billing & Compliance for Hospital Outpatient & Professional Services

Join Michael Calahan, PA, MBA for this radiation oncology coding and compliance webcast as he explains the fundamentals of coding, billing, reporting, and documentation for hospital outpatient and professional services. Learn how the 2026 radiation therapy coding changes affect current practices, how to distinguish technical and professional services, and how to address bundling, units, frequency, modifiers, and documentation requirements. Michael will also help you identify radiation oncology coding and billing vulnerabilities that could lead to denials, overpayments, repayment demands, or federal audit exposure.

October 20, 2026

CMS Compliance & Audit Readiness Bundle

Get two essential perspectives on CMS compliance for $199.

The Two-Midnight Rule helps you navigate short-stay admissions, patient status, and evolving 2026-2027 requirements, while CMS CRUSH explores the next wave of program integrity, payment oversight, and data-driven scrutiny.

Two RACmonitor webcasts. One practical approach to preparing for increased CMS oversight.

September 20, 2026

Preparing for 2027: Inpatient & Outpatient Policy Changes for Case Management and Utilization Review

The 2027 CMS policy changes will impact case management, utilization review, reimbursement, and patient status decision-making long before they officially take effect. Join nationally recognized physician advisor Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he explains the finalized and proposed inpatient and outpatient rule changes, expanding bundled payment initiatives, payment updates, and evolving payer expectations. Gain practical guidance to help your organization prepare early, strengthen compliance, reduce reimbursement risk, and confidently navigate the transition to 2027.

September 17, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24