Cardiology Question for the Week of April 26, 2021

A patient undergoes an initial insertion of a dual-chamber pacemaker system. An RA lead is implanted. In the RV, 2 leads are implanted – 1 at the apex and 1 at the His bundle. Would this be coded with 33208 only, since the code description contains the word “electrode(s)”? Or, can 33999 be added to 33208 to represent the extra lead/extra work involved?

Read the Answer

Cardiology Question for the Week of April 12, 2021

In the example of the EKG with an EP study, do you agree that we should report the 93005 but not modify it with modifier 59? Do other hospitals override the edit instead of using the GZ? If the entire claim is denied due to the GZ modifier being on the claim, what action should we take? Should we reach out to our FI?

Read the Answer

Cardiology Question for the Week of March 8, 2021

Can we bill for an angiogram and catheter placement for a failed access site done during a Left Heart Catheterization (LHC)? For example, the right radial artery (RRA) access was obtained but we could not navigate the wire to the right subclavian. Right brachial artery angiography was performed through the diagnostic catheter. There was moderate tortuosity and the vessel size was small, and a decision was made to pursue a right femoral artery access. Could we bill 36140-59 and 75710-59 with LHC 93458?

Read the Answer

CPT® copyright 2024 American Medical Association (AMA). All rights reserved.

Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or not contained herein.

CPT is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24